Visit The Institute for Inclusive Security Website >>

Travis Wheeler

This post is by Martha Engole and Travis Wheeler.

Author’s note: On Wed., Jan. 30, 2013, Inclusive Security and its civil society partners will be participating in an event hosted by the US Institute of Peace to commemorate the first anniversary of the US National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security. This post looks back at the US NAP and the many achievements it catalyzed in Year One. Click here to RSVP for the event.

The World Takes Note

In 2000, the UN Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 1325 (UNSCR 1325), the international community’s landmark recognition of women’s dynamic, yet underutilized, contributions to ending violent conflict and stabilizing societies in its wake. Subsequently, nearly 40 countries and regional bodies launched NAPs or similar policies, which offer frameworks to uphold the letter and spirit of UNSCR 1325 across doctrine, programming, and operations.

The US Stands Up

For more than a decade, US civil society organizations clamored for the country to put its diplomatic clout behind the “women, peace, and security” agenda. Thanks in part to their advocacy, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the US’s commitment to developing a NAP in a speech before the Security Council marking Resolution 1325’s 10th anniversary.

In December 2011, President Obama signed Executive Order 13595 instituting the first-ever US National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security. In a speech at Georgetown University, Secretary Clinton celebrated the US NAP’s fruition, hailing it as a “comprehensive roadmap” for reorienting US foreign, defense, and development policy to better protect women and promote their inclusion in decision-making. Importantly, she addressed the skeptics directly, cautioning them against viewing the plan as pertaining to so-called women’s issues, rather than matters of war and peace: “It truly does cut to the heart of our national security and the security of people everywhere, because the sad fact is that the way the international community tries to build peace and security today just isn’t getting the job done.”

Taking the NAP to the Next Level

The administration didn’t stop there, instead following the NAP’s release with a flurry of additional policies designed to reinforce the plan, among them:

  1. USAID’s Counter-Trafficking in Persons (C-TIP) Policy [PDF] (February 2012). This policy builds on the “three Ps” of counter-trafficking—Prevention, Protection, and Prosecution—with emphases on strengthening partnerships with governments, the private sector, and local civil society, as well as increasing the evidence base to drive investments in proven strategies.
  2. Secretarial Policy Guidance on Promoting Gender Equality to Achieve National Security and Foreign Policy Objectives (March 2012). The third of seven policy guidance issued on Secretary Clinton’s watch, it requires the State Dept.’s bureaus, offices, and embassies to account for gender in their strategic planning and budgeting in addition to improving monitoring and evaluation of foreign assistance programs.
  3. USAID’s Gender Equality and Female Empowerment Policy [PDF] (March 2012). The agency’s first revamped gender policy in three decades seeks to eliminate gender disparities, protect women and men from gender-based violence, and increase women’s access to decision-making opportunities.
  4. State Dept. and USAID’s NAP Implementation Plans [PDF] (August 2012). These twin plans detail emblematic, in-progress, and planned activities designed to instigate progress toward specific outcomes, such as women’s leadership in the security sector. They delineate clear roles and lines of responsibility in addition to discussing regional programming in-depth.
  5. United States Strategy to Prevent and Respond to Gender-based Violence Globally [PDF] (August 2012). Mandated by the Fiscal Year 2012 Appropriations legislation, among the strategy’s goals is changing the way USAID determines its gender-based violence programming priorities by factoring in the political will and technical capacity of US and host government stakeholders, as well as local civil society.

Legislative Action on Capitol Hill

The impressive rollout of administration policies was matched on Capitol Hill by efforts to strengthen the prospects of effective implementation of these policy reforms through legislative action.

In early August, Rep. Russ Carnahan (D-MO) was joined by Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) in introducing the bipartisan, bicameral Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2012 (S. 3477, H.R. 6255), the first stand-alone legislation in congressional history to address “inclusive security.” The act’s authors considered the US NAP’s implementation “paramount… [to] increasing overall global stability and prosperity,” and its provisions were designed to give Congress a role in ensuring this outcome. For instance, the House version required the Secretary of State to submit an annual report to Congress outlining US diplomatic and assistance initiatives’ impact on women’s participation in peace negotiations. While there wasn’t enough time remaining on the 112th’s legislative calendar to move the bill forward, it ultimately secured the backing of 30 men and women legislators, including three Senate Republicans and about a dozen influential committee chairs.

Besides the Act, legislative provisions promoting US NAP implementation and Afghan women’s security were prominent in this year’s State, Foreign Operations, and Related Appropriations Bill and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. The bill introduced by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) called for an appropriation of $50 million to finance a multiyear strategy to ensure the US NAP’s implementation. [PDF] Meanwhile, Sen. Bob Casey (D-PA) championed a bipartisan amendment to the NDAA requiring the State Dept. and Pentagon to compile a report assessing the transition’s impact on women’s security. Rep. Niki Tsongas (D-MA) was one of many members of Congress who spoke in favor of this amendment on the House floor.

What’s Next?

From the US National Action Plan to the Women, Peace, and Security Act, 2012 was without a doubt a banner year. Now that the US has adopted strong policies, civil society will take on the task of holding the government accountable for the promises made to women leaders from Cairo to Kandahar. Inclusive Security Action is looking forward to ensure US NAP implementation is not only fully resourced with the requisite finances, political will, and technical capacity necessary for success but also continuously monitored, evaluated, and improved. The goal is to set our ambitions high, secure the inclusion of women and civil society in the range of endeavors aimed at ending war, and, ultimately, ensure peace processes around the world achieve and sustain the peace they seek to provide.

Martha Engole is an IREX fellow at The Institute for Inclusive Security. During her fellowship, she’s conducted a needs assessment with Women Waging Peace Network members from Burundi, Eritrea, Kenya, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and South Africa. Currently, Martha is in Uganda continuing her work with Teso Women Peace Activists. For the next several months, she’ll apply the insights gained at Inclusive Security to equip women peacebuilders in the Teso and Karamoja regions of Northern Uganda with conflict transformation skills.

Travis Wheeler is a senior policy adviser at Inclusive Security Action, where he shapes advocacy, analysis, and technical assistance to advance implementation of the US National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security.

Inclusive Security Action partners with The Institute for Inclusive Security to increase the participation of all stakeholders—particularly women—in preventing, resolving, and rebuilding after deadly conflict.

Like this post?

Rep. Carnahan stands with two Libyan Women

Rep. Russ Carnahan (left), a leading member of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Women, Peace, and Security Act’s primary champion, poses for a photo with Women Waging Peace Network members Alaa Murabit (center) and Amina Megheirbi (right) after discussing the political transition process in Libya. (Inclusive Security archives)

Yesterday, Reps. Russ Carnahan (D-MO) and Howard Berman (D-CA), as well as Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), introduced the bicameral, bipartisan Women, Peace, and Security Act of 2012 (H.R. 6255 / S. 3477). According to its champions, the act would increase the role of women in conflict prevention and resolution and advance the implementation of the US National Action Plan on Women, Peace, and Security launched by President Obama’s executive order in December 2011.

“For too long, women have been left out of peace negotiations—even though they are disproportionately affected by these conflicts,” Sen. Boxer said in a statement released by her office. “From Northern Ireland to Liberia, women have proven how valuable their contributions are to peace talks, conflict prevention and conflict mediation, so it is critical that we ensure that women are at the table.”

According to Hunt Alternatives, LLC* [PDF], the legislation would:

  • Encourage the US to work with international partners and eliminate barriers to women’s participation in high-stakes peace and security processes.
  • Mandate training for US defense, diplomatic, and development personnel on the value of women’s inclusion and strategies for achieving it.
  • Require the secretary of state to provide an annual report to Congress that evaluates US diplomatic and foreign assistance vis-à-vis women’s participation.

Thirty-six US civil society organizations—including Amnesty International USA, Vital Voices, and Women Thrive Worldwide—issued a statement [PDF] applauding the introduction of the WPS Act. In the legislation, the bill’s cosponsors cited civil society’s “invaluable contributions” and called on the Obama administration to consult with them to ensure the US NAP’s effective implementation.

Original Cosponsors

Sens.:

  • Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
  • Scott Brown (R-MA)
  • Bob Casey (D-PA)
  • Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
  • Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX)
  • Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
  • Olympia Snowe (R-ME)

All of these senators sit on key committees, including Foreign Relations, Armed Services, Intelligence, and Appropriations.

Reps.:

  • Russ Carnahan (D-MO)
  • Howard Berman (D-CA)
  • John Conyers (D-MI)
  • Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX)
  • Barbara Lee (D-CA)
  • Carolyn Maloney (D-NY)
  • Jim McDermott (D-WA)
  • Jim McGovern (D-MA)
  • Jim Moran (D-VA)
  • Chris Murphy (D-CT)
  • Chellie Pingree (D-ME)
  • Jan Schakowsky (D-IL)
  • Jackie Speier (D-CA)
  • Niki Tsongas (D-MA)
  • Chris Van Hollen (D-MD)

As in the Senate, most of these representatives sit on key committees, including Foreign Affairs, Armed Services, Intelligence, Appropriations, and Judiciary.

See Rep. Carnahan’s statement.

*Hunt Alternatives LLC serves as the family office for Ambassador Swanee Hunt and is a separate legal entity from The Institute for Inclusive Security, a program of Hunt Alternatives Fund.

 Travis Wheeler is a legislative adviser to Ambassador Hunt and an advocate at Inclusive Security.

Like this post?

A woman stands in a field holding a kite

A woman holds a kite printed with “demand Afghan women’s rights” in Chicago earlier this month, where Amnesty International hosted a summit alongside the Chicago NATO Summit to urge world leaders to increase women’s participation in peace negotiations and the security transition. (Photo courtesy of Amnesty International)

Earlier this month at the 2012 Chicago NATO Summit, the Afghan government’s delegation included only one Afghan woman, a member of President Hamid Karzai’s official entourage. Contrast this to the 2011 Bonn Conference where women made up almost a quarter of the Afghan government’s delegation and several participated in a civil society forum tied to the conference.

With women shut out of the security talks in Chicago, Amnesty International put on a shadow summit the first day of the NATO Summit to highlight the lack of attention given to women’s inclusion in the future of Afghanistan. Their summit featured Afghan women leaders discussing their perspectives on peace and transition. In addition to the four Afghans, a veritable “who’s who” slate of longtime women’s champions, including Madeleine Albright, former secretary of state, Melanne Verveer, ambassador-at-large for global women’s issues, and Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) attended the summit.

[click to continue…]

Like this post?

Members of the Afghan women's task force seated around a table

Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), third from left, and Donna Edwards (D-MD), second from left, listen as Hasina Safi, first from right, shares Afghan women's perspectives on peace negotiations and the transition. The congresswomen had invited Safi and other Afghan Women’s Network members to participate in the launch event of their task force, pictured here, in June 2011. (Photo courtesy of Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers’ office)

When President Barack Obama addressed the American public from Bagram Airbase in Afghanistan earlier this month, he had a message for Afghans as well: “As you stand up, you will not stand alone.”

As NATO heads of state and other world leaders make their way to the President’s hometown, US lawmakers, men and women from both sides of the aisle, have pledged to stand alongside Afghan women throughout the security and political transitions that are essential for the country’s future stability—and they want NATO member countries to do the same at their upcoming summit in Chicago.

In a letter [PDF] to the President, Reps. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) and Donna Edwards (D-MD), co-chairs of the Afghan Women’s Task Force, expressed their concern that the transition of security responsibility to Afghan forces and the corresponding withdrawal of international troops could have a negative impact on women’s security and participation in public life. At Chicago, they wrote that NATO member countries should reaffirm their commitments “to support important rights of Afghan women, including freedom of movement, full participation in public life, freedom from violence, access to government services, and security.”

[click to continue…]

Like this post?

Afghan Women at Bonn
Inclusive Security and Care’s Afghanistan division partnered with the Afghan Women’s Network to promote women’s inclusion in the Bonn Conference. The women of the network stand in front of the Afghan Women Solidarity Wall, an initiative organized by Channel 16 and partners.

This post was originally published on The Huffington Post.

On December 5, the international community will gather with Afghan leaders in Bonn, Germany’s picturesque Cold War-era capital, for the latest stock-taking of Afghanistan. While some are tempering expectations for the second major conference in Bonn in ten years, Afghan women leaders see an opportunity — and they’re doing everything they can to seize it.

Despite not receiving invitations to the conference itself, 10 members of the Afghan Women’s Network (AWN), a non-partisan network of women and women’s NGOs working to empower Afghan women and ensure their equal participation in Afghan society, will go to Germany in an audacious attempt to influence foreign ministers and the media from the sidelines of the conference. While they’d rather be active participants or observers to the actual event, they’ve been here before.

At the January 2010 London Conference, a delegation of five uninvited Afghan women leaders crashed the party and succeeded in catching the attention of US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Over the summer, AWN partnered with The Institute for Inclusive Security, which works to enhance the inclusion of women in peace processes, to bring a delegation of a dozen women leaders from Kabul, Kandahar, and several conflict-affected provinces to Washington, DC for a week of high-level exchanges with US officials. From the White House, to the Pentagon, to the US Capitol, their message was clear: Afghan women must be included in all decision-making, national and international, related to the peace process and transition — and the 2011 Bonn Conference is no exception.

Since their visit to Washington, AWN has waged a tireless advocacy campaign around this very message — and it appears they’ve had an impact. Although no members of AWN will officially be attending the conference, 13 women from the High Peace Council, parliament, and various ministries have been invited to join President Karzai’s official delegation to Bonn. Nearly 50 percent of the Afghan leaders participating in the December 3 Civil Society Forum in Bonn are also women. What’s more, a woman leader has been nominated to represent the views of Afghan civil society at the conference plenary.

Although Bonn represents somewhat of a watershed moment in terms of Afghan women’s inclusion at an international conference, what remains to be seen is whether or not those gathered in Germany will seek to establish more inclusive frameworks that will help sustain women’s gains amidst reconciliation with the Taliban, reintegration of insurgents into local communities, and a security transition that the White House may try to accelerate.

Today, several influential US female members of Congress led a bicameral, bipartisan effort to reach out to Secretary Clinton about Bonn. Washington Republican Cathy McMorris Rodgers and Maryland Democrat Donna Edwards, co-chairs of the newly-minted Afghan Women’s Task Force, along with 24 other female elected officials, including Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Kay Bailey Hutchinson (R-TX ), wrote to Secretary Clinton to ensure the opportunity isn’t lost. In their letter they express their hope that Afghan and international leaders will articulate a plan for “a more inclusive approach to reconciliation that will open avenues for women’s meaningful inclusion and put Afghanistan firmly on the path of peace and prosperity.”

Wazhma Frogh, an activist who will be in Germany with the Afghan Women’s Network, shares the congresswomen’s vision. “After the tragic assassination of Rabbani [the High Peace Council's former leader], everyone was writing two obituaries: one for him and one for the reconciliation process. As an Afghan woman, I always believe peace is possible — but we need to move from political deal-making towards a citizen-led national dialogue, just as they did in South Africa.”

While a more inclusive reconciliation process via a national dialogue remains a top advocacy priority for Afghan women, the AWN delegates will arrive prepared to speak to any item on the conference’s agenda.

When it comes to reconciliation, AWN wants to see more women — at least 30 percent — appointed to the High Peace Council (the government body charged with exploring reconciliation with the Taliban) and Provincial Peace Councils. Currently, only 9 out of 70 HPC members are women and Provincial Peace Councils tend to have only one woman representative or none at all.

When it comes to reintegration, AWN wants to see family-oriented, not fighter-oriented, transitional assistance, which, they argue, would serve the dual purpose of attracting more fighters to the reintegration program and preventing fighters who have already joined from returning to the insurgency.

When it comes to transition, AWN wants to see a responsible transition where the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force and Afghan authorities involve them in transition planning and track indicators that gauge the transition’s impact on women’s security.

When it comes to international engagement beyond 2014, AWN wants to see continued political and financial support for women-led projects and initiatives, as well as people-to-people peacebuilding exchanges at the regional level, particularly with Pakistan.

Samira Hamidi, AWN’s country director and a member of the delegation to Germany, thinks they’ll find a receptive audience in Bonn. “President Karzai, Secretary Clinton, and many others are looking to Afghan women for solutions. We’ve delivered in the past and we plan to do so again.”

In advance of Bonn, AWN held regional consultations with more than 500 women leaders from 20 provinces and published a position paper outlining women’s perspectives and recommendations. And on the morning of December 5, as the diplomatic proceedings begin, AWN will release a women’s declaration at a press conference in Germany, outlining what they would have said had they been given the opportunity to address conference participants directly.

No matter what happens next week, one thing is clear: Afghan women understand that peace is a process, not an event. It’s time for the international community to get with the program and take concrete steps — beginning at Bonn — to ensure women are key players in building a peaceful, prosperous, and, most importantly, inclusive Afghanistan.

Like this post?